[TF-AIDN] minutes of the call (11-06-2020)
zied.bouziri at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 11:24:19 CEST 2020
Thank you for the minutes
I agree with the proposition of Dr Sarmed, since it is based on RFC 7940
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7940>by using the "type" Attribute of
variant (section 5.3.2) <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7940#section-5.3.2>
*"Instead of the default action of applying the most restrictive
disposition to the entire label, such a generalized resolution can be used
to achieve additional goals, such as limiting the set of allocatable
variant labels or implementing other policies found in existing LGRs "*
In this way two new variant type can be used : Allocatable-extended and
- activated-extended is used to make label available for allocation for
certain extended cross-repertoire variants,
- allocatable-extended is used make label available for allocation for
certain in-repertoire variants.
For the ALEF variant class, we can use the *allocatable-extended *type
(which has the *blocked* action by default) in order to maximize the number
of blocked variants.
Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 07:06, Nabil Benamar <benamar73 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Salam Dear TF-AIDNs members ,
> I hope you are all doing well.
> The TF-AIDNs members had a meeting on 11-06-2020 where we discussed the
> following points:
> 1. Whether we should adopt the solution proposed by Dr. Sarmad to
> reduce the number of allocatable variants.
> 2. Or, investigate further on the feasibility and easiness of the
> Master Key based solution proposed by CITC.
> Please, send your comments as soon as you can so that we get back to ICANN
> without further delays.
> Thank you all for your commitment.
> Best regards
> Nabil Benamar
> نبيل بنعمرو
> TF-AIDN mailing list
> TF-AIDN at meswg.org
*cordially*, *مع تحياتي*
*Zied BOUZIRI*، *زياد بوزيري*
ISET Charguia, Tunisie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the TF-AIDN