[TF-AIDN] minutes of the call (11-06-2020)

[Tariq Soomro]

Dear All,
I also go with Dr. Sarmad's suggestions.

regards,

Prof. Tariq R. Soomro, PhD,
Dean CCSIS, Institute of Business Management, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Vice-Chair IEEE Karachi Section,
R10 Southern Area Coordinator Computer Society,
Senior Member IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, IEEE GRSS USA,
Member PMI, Life Member Computer Society of Pakistan, Sindh Graduates
Associations,
Founder President SUCSA.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=0zP5EYoAAAAJ&hl=en


On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:24 PM Zied BOUZIRI <zied.bouziri at gmail.com> wrote:

> Salem Nabil
> Thank you for the minutes
> I agree with the proposition of Dr Sarmed, since it is based on RFC 7940
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7940>by using the "type" Attribute of
> variant (section 5.3.2)
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7940#section-5.3.2>
>
> *"Instead of the default action of applying the   most restrictive
> disposition to the entire label, such a generalized resolution can be used
> to achieve additional goals, such as limiting   the set of allocatable
> variant labels or implementing other policies  found in existing LGRs "*
>
> In this way   two new variant type can be used  : Allocatable-extended
>  and  Activated-extended :
> - activated-extended is used to make label available for allocation for
> certain extended cross-repertoire variants,
> - allocatable-extended is used make label available for allocation for
> certain in-repertoire variants.
>
> For the ALEF variant class, we can use the *allocatable-extended *type
> (which has the *blocked* action by default) in order to maximize the
> number of blocked variants.
> Best regards
>
>
> Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 07:06, Nabil Benamar <benamar73 at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Salam Dear TF-AIDNs members ,
>>
>> I hope you are all doing well.
>>
>> The TF-AIDNs members had a meeting on 11-06-2020 where we discussed the
>> following points:
>>
>>
>>    1. Whether we should adopt the solution proposed by Dr. Sarmad to
>>    reduce the number of allocatable variants.
>>    2. Or, investigate further on the feasibility and easiness of the
>>    Master Key based solution proposed by CITC.
>>
>>
>> Please, send your comments as soon as you can so that we get back to
>> ICANN without further delays.
>>
>>
>> Thank you all for your commitment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Nabil Benamar
>> -------------------
>> نبيل بنعمرو
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TF-AIDN mailing list
>> TF-AIDN at meswg.org
>> http://lists.meswg.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-aidn
>>
>
>
> --
> *cordially*, *مع تحياتي*
> *Zied BOUZIRI*، *زياد بوزيري*
> ISET Charguia, Tunisie
> www.bouziri.tn
> _______________________________________________
> TF-AIDN mailing list
> TF-AIDN at meswg.org
> http://lists.meswg.org/mailman/listinfo/tf-aidn
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.meswg.org/pipermail/tf-aidn/attachments/20200616/07273157/attachment.html>